With technology tools rapidly developing, law firms need specialised advice — independently, without vendor conflict of interest. We help European law firms make better technology decisions: identify the right combination of tools, make sure that those tools work well together, and map out automation where it is possible — so the stack works as a system, not a collection of disconnected subscriptions.
Beyond technology selection, we help firms review and remediate their technology stack against the full requirements of GDPR, the EU AI Act, and related local regulations.
Founder, Surediligence
I'm Igor Nikitin, a senior technology leader based in the Netherlands. Over the past 20 years I have worked on the vendor side of enterprise software across EMEA — with companies including Apple, Nokia, Elsevier, and LexisNexis. I led complex B2B sales cycles, technology implementations, and go-to-market strategies. I know how enterprise software is built, priced, and sold, because I spent two decades doing exactly that.
When I moved into legal technology, one thing became clear: law firms face the same problems I have seen everywhere else — fragmented tools, underused investments, vendor contracts accepted on vendor terms. What surprised me was how little independent help was available. Most advice in this space comes from vendors, resellers, or consultants with referral arrangements. That gap is why I built Surediligence: independent advice, no vendor ties, fixed fees.