With technology tools rapidly developing, law firms need specialised advice — independently, without vendor conflict of interest. We help European law firms make better technology decisions: identify the right combination of tools, make sure that those tools work well together, and map out automation where it is possible — so the stack works as a system, not a collection of disconnected subscriptions.
Beyond technology selection, we help firms review and remediate their technology stack against the full requirements of GDPR, the EU AI Act, and related local regulations.
Founder, Surediligence
I spent 20 years on the vendor side of enterprise software across EMEA — at top technology companies — leading sales cycles, technology rollouts, and go-to-market strategies. I know how enterprise software is built, priced, and sold. I also know how it tends to land — sometimes a capable platform nobody had the capacity to configure, sometimes a tool that looked right on paper but never matched how the firm actually worked.
In legal technology, the pattern is the same: fragmented tools, underused investments, vendor contracts accepted on vendor terms. What surprised me was how little independent help was available. Most advice in this space comes from vendors, resellers, or consultants with referral arrangements. That gap is why I built Surediligence — independent advice, no vendor ties, fixed fees.